SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(AP) 5

P.CHANDRA REDDY, VENKATESAM
Medaboyina Seethanna – Appellant
Versus
Arubandi Sankara Lakshmi Devi – Respondent


CHANDRA REDDY, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the Order of the Subordinate judge Visakhapatnam, accepting an application to add the legal representatives of the second judgment-debtor in O. S. No. 80 of 1933. It arises in the following circumstances. In execution of a decree obtained by the present respondents against three persons including the predecessors-in- interest of the appellants, some of the properties belonging to the three judgmentdebtors were brought to sale on 16th August, 1954 and were purchased by the decree-holders themselves. The sale was confirmed on 20th September, 1954. Sometime later, the decree-holder-auction-purchasers filed a petition in the District munsifs Court, Rajam, for delivery of possession of these properties making all the judgment-debtors parties to that application. It may be mentioned here that the decree was transferred to the District Munsifs Court, Rajam, for execution, as the properties of the judgment-debtors were situate within the jurisdiction of that Court. It is for that reason that the application for delivery was presented in that Court. Meanwhile, the second judgment-debtor seems to have died. The auction-purchasers coming to





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top