SANJEEVA ROW NAIDU, JAGMOHAN REDDY, P.CHANDRA REDDY
Kudapa Subbanna – Appellant
Versus
Ghitturi Subbanna – Respondent
( 1 ) THE Order of the Court was made by chandra Reddy, C. J.-We are told that there is conflict between Subbanna v. Subbanna , (1959) 2 An. W. R. 546 : 1959 A. L. T. 207) on the one hand and Godavarti Raja v. Ramachandraswami , (1943) 1 M. L. J. 253 : a. I. R. 1943 Mad 354 venkata Kumar a v. Subbayamma , A. I. R. 1915 Mad. 226 and also other decisions of other High Courts on the other, on the interpretation of Order 20, rule 12, Civil Procedure Code. To resolve this conflict this matter will be placed before a Full Bench. In pursuance of the above Order, this appeal came on for hearing before the full Bench; the Judgment of the Full Bench was delivered by chandra Reddy, C. J.--The question to be answered by the Full Bench is as to whether mesne profits could be allowed for more than three years from the date of the decree.
( 2 ) THE facts necessary for the present purpose may be briefly narrated. An action was laid in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Eluru, for possession of the A and C schedule properties annexed to the plaint and for partition and possession of 1/24th share in the B schedule properties. During the pendency of the suit, the plaintiff died and the sec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.