( 1 ) THE question that arises for determination in this appeal is whether a suit under Section 6 of the Government Demands Act (No. IV of 1308 F.) is maintainable though the notice prescribed by Section 80 Civil Procedure Code is not given by the plaintiff to the Government. The question arises under the following circumstances.

( 2 ) THE appellant was the plaintiff in this suit which was dismissed by the lower Court as not maintainable for the reason that the notice under Section 80 Civil Procedure Code was not given to the State of Andhra Pradesh who is the defendant in the case. The allegations in the plaint are that one Ahmad Abdul Hakim was awarded an Indian Scholarship for studying medicine in Bombay for a period of 31/2 years and that he entered into an agreement with the then Government of Hyderabad on 22-9-1925. The plaintiff stood surety for him and executed a surety bond dated 23-9-1955 in favour of then Government of Hyderabad. The scholarship holder completed his course of study in Bombay and returned to Hyderabad; but the State Government would not entertain him in any suitable job, and, therefore, the scholarship-holder had to remove himself to the United Kingdom fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document