SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(AP) 69

P.CHANDRA REDDY, M.SESHACHALAPATI
Chand Sultana alias Indra Bai – Appellant
Versus
Khurshid Begum – Respondent


REDDY, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the order of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, declining to grant a temporary injunction restraining the respondents herein from receiving or taking delivery of all or any of the plaint schedule properties either moveable or immoveable, or to receive any amounts from the Receiver-cum-Commissioner appointed in C. S. No. 13 of 1958 on the file of the High Court pending disposal of the suit O. S. No. 23 of 1961 on the file of the City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

( 2 ) THE application was made under Order 39, Rule 2 pending a suit brought by the appellant in forma pauperis claiming to be the daughter of the Nawab Mir Yousuf AH Khan popularly known as Sir Salar Jung III (hereinafter to be referred to as the Nawab) for a declaration that she is the legitimate daughter of the said Nawab and for possession of his assets and properties.

( 3 ) SIR Salar Jung III died on 22-3-1949 leaving behind him enormous private properties and a big jagir which has become the subject-matter of endless litigation.

( 4 ) SHORTLY after his death, the Salar Jung Estate Administration Regulation 1358 F. i. e. , 34 of 1358 F. was enacted empowering the Govern










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top