SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(AP) 90

MOHD.MIRZA, P.CHANDRA REDDY
Survepalli Siddaiah – Appellant
Versus
Survepalli Penchalamma – Respondent


REDDY, C. J.

( 1 ) THE point involved in this appeal beats on the applicability of the doctrine of Res Judicata to proceedings under the Hindu Marriage Act.

( 2 ) THE appellant, who is the husband of the respondent, applied for a decree for judicial separation against his wife in the Subordinate Judges Court, Kavali, on the allegation that she had deserted him some years before the institution of the petition.

( 3 ) THE petition was opposed by the wife inter alia on the plea that a prior decision, rendered by the District Munsifs Court, Kavali, that the husband had abandoned his wife and therefore the latter was entitled to separate maintenance operated as res judicata in the subsequent proceedings. This issue was tried as a preliminary one and it was found in favour of the respondent, the wife. In this view of the matter, the Subordinate Judge dismissed the petition filed by the Husband under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. It is this view of the Subordinate Judge that is impugned before us in this appeal preferred by the aggrieved husband.

( 4 ) IT is contended by Sri Venkatarama Sastry, learned counsel for the appellant, that since the condition regarding the compete








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top