SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(AP) 127

CHANDRASEKHARA SASTRI
Hyderabad Municipal Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Hyderabad Municipal Corporation – Respondent


( 1 ) THE Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad, represented by its Commissioner is the petitioner in these four Civil Revision Petitions and the exhibition Society, Hyderabad, is the respondent.

( 2 ) COMMON questions for decision arise in these four cases. The main question for decision is whether the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation can levy Entertainment-tax at the rate of 4 np. per ticket on the fees collected by the Exhibition Society from the visitors to the Exhibition Grounds paid by them as entrance-fee at the gate. The facts leading to the filing of these Revision Petitions are as follows : The exhibition Society is an Association formed and registered as a limited company under section 26 of the Hyderabad Companies Act (IV of 1320-F. ). They had been granted exemption from payment of Entertainment-tax by the Municipal Corporation by letter No. 2549 , dated 6th Shehrewar, I356-F. At the time, the entrance fee for each individual was As. 2 O. S. But, in the year 1954, the entrance-fee was fixed 2 annas I. G. Then, the Standing Committee of the Municipal Corporation levied an Entertainment-tax of 4 pies for each entrance ticket for the exhibition of 1954. Then, represen











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top