SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(AP) 120

CHANDRASEKHARA SASTRI, UMAMAHESWARAM
Bhookya Abbanna – Appellant
Versus
Maramraju Seshagir Rao – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS is an appeal directed against the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge of Warangal decreeing the plaintiffs suit O. S. No. 22 of 1958. the suit was instituted by six plaintiffs for a declaration that they were the owners of the suit lands, and for recovery of possession and for recovery of arrears of rent. It was stated in paragraph 1 of the plaint that as the result of partition entered into between plaintiffs 1 to 5 and the 6th plaintiff the properties fell to the share of plaintiffs 1 to 5. According to paragraph 2 of the plaint, the defendants are the asamees cultivating the suit lands. As they defaulted to pay rent, a suit was instituted in Mahboobabad Tahseel for eviction and for recovery of arrears of rent. the suit was decreed. The defendants thereupon trespassed on the plaint schedule lands. A suit was once again filed in Mahboobabad Tahseel on 17-3-1958. There was a compromise entered into between the plaintiffs and the defendants under which the defendants agreed to purchase the wet lands at the rate of Rs. 2,000. 00 per acre, dry land at the rate of Rs. 275. 00 per acre and bagat lands at Rs. 500. 00 per acre. They once again defaulted to pay the sale







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top