SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(AP) 224

ANANTA NARAYANA AYYAR
K. Sudersanam – Appellant
Versus
S. Venkatarao – Respondent


AYYAR, J.

( 1 ) IN the Court of the Chief Judge, Small Causes, Hyderabad, the sole plaintiff S. Venkat Rao filed a suit (S. C. S. No. 135/2 of 1959) against the sole defendant Mrs. K. Sudersanam on a promissory note which had been executed by the defendant on 12-3-1956 for a sum of Rs. 1,000. 00. The defendant contested the suit on various grounds. The learned Chief Judge awarded a decree against the defendant as prayed for. The defendant thereupon filed this revision, petition against the said judgment and decree.

( 2 ) THE main contentions in the plaint were as follows: The defendant was a teacher in a Railway school and was known to the plaintiffs wife for a long time. The defendant approached the plaintiff for a loan of Rs. 1,600. 00 and the plaintiff accordingly agreed. The defendant herself wrote in urdu the promissory note (Ex. A-1) and receipt for a sum of Rs. 1,600. 00. After that, the plain-tiff found that he had only Rs. 1,000. 00 and had advanced that sum. At the instance of the defendant, the plaintiff struck out the figure of Rs. 1,600. 00 and noted in Telugu, the figure of Rs. 1,000. 00 which was actually the amount being advanced as loan. Then the defendant herself























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top