SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(AP) 36

CHANDRASEKHARA SASTRI, P.CHANDRA REDDY
Srimat Kilambi Venkata Rangacharyulu – Appellant
Versus
Srimat Kilambi Gopala Krishnamacharyulu – Respondent


CHANDRASEKHARA SASTRI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal under clause (15) of the Letters Patent is preferred against the Judgment of Krishna Rao, J. , in C. M. A. No. 340 of 1957. The facts of the case are as follows :- o. P. No. 46 of 1957 was filed by the petitioner therein against three respondents to the O. P. , under section 62 of the Indian Lunacy Act (IV of 1912) praying to hold an inquisition for the purpose of ascertaining whether the first respondent in the o. P. , Srimat Kilambi Venkata Rangacharyulu is of unsound mind and to appoint a manager to the estate of the first respondent. The petitioner in the O. P. claimed to be an agnatic relation of the first respondent. According to the allegations in the o. P. , the first respondent was married twice. The first wife having died in or about 1906, he married the sister of the second respondent. The petitioner was informed and believed the same to be true that the first respondent became a lunatic a short time before the death of his first wife or a very short time after her death and that he is incapable of managing his affairs ; but it is admitted in the O. P. that the first respondent is capable of managing himself and is not dangerou










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top