SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(AP) 67

SATYANARAYANA RAJU, P.CHANDRA REDDY
Advocate-General, A. P. – Appellant
Versus
P. H. Mowle – Respondent


SATYANARAYANA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition "under the provisions of the Vexatious, litigation (Prevention) Act, 1949 (Madras Act VIII of 1949), hereinafter referred to as the Act.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the Advocate-General of Andhra Pradesh. The respondent p. H. Mowle, aged about 45 years, is a businessman and resident of Hyderabad. It is. averred by the Advocate-General that the respondent has been, habitually and without any reasonable grounds, instituting vexatious proceedings in Courts situated at hyderabad and Secunderabad and also in the High Court, all of which he is conducting in person. It is stated that he has been responsible for considerable amount of litigation. The Advocate-General has filed a long list of proceedings instituted by the respondent. He prays that an order may be made that the respondent shall not institute any proceedings, civil or criminal, (a) in the High Court without the leave of that Court, (b) in any Court in the cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad without the leave of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, and (c) in any Court elsewhere in the State without the leave of the District Judge of the concerned district; and that the order to be m






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top