CHANDRA REDDY, CJ.

( 1 ) THE constitutionality of section 8 of the Central Sales tax, (LXXIV of 1956) (hereinafter to be called the Act for the sake of convenience) is challenged in these petitions.

( 2 ) MOST of the petitioners carry on business in jaggery and export it to several states in the country, the others being dealers either in groundnut-oil, rice or niger seeds. While submitting returns, they claimed exemption in respect of the part of the turnover covering sales of inter-State character on the plea that the tax had already be n paid on the first sales. The exemption was disallowed on the ground that tax was leviable as the sales were subject to tax under section 8 of the central Sales Tax Act. Impugning the order of the assessing authorities, the aggrieved assessees have put in these petitions.

( 3 ) THE principal contention pressed upon us is that section 8 of the Central Act, which enables the Revenue to tax transactions in respect of which single point tax alone was leviable under the State law, is unconstitutional in that it is violative of the equal protection of laws embodied in Article 14 of the Constitution. It is maintained that, by reason of section 8, while

Click Here to Read the rest of this document