SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(AP) 129

CHANDRASEKHARA SASTRI, P.CHANDRA REDDY
Gorla Buchayya – Appellant
Versus
Mukala Swami Naidu – Respondent


CHANDRA REDDY, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition involves the interpretation of some of the provisions of the Andhra Tenancy Act, 1956 (XVIII of 1956) (hereinafter called the Tenancy Act ). This has been referred to a Bench by our learned brother, satyanarayana Raju, J. , who heard it in the first instance, as there is no direct decision bearing on the question posed by this revision and to have an authoritative decision. The facts material for the purpose of the present enquiry lie in a narrow compass and may be stated as follows. The petitioners and the respondent put forward competing titles to a holding in Panduri village in the Mallavaram estate which was notified under the Madras Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) act, (XXVI of 1948) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on 15th June, 1955. The petitioners claimed to be the ryots in respect of these lands by virtue of being the tenants under the landlord, one Adepureddi Govaramma, while the respondent traced his occupancy rights to a lease obtained from another person of the same name, Govaramma. Both parties approached the Settlement Officer for the issue of ryotwari patta each claiming to be the occupancy tena
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top