SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(AP) 155

P.CHANDRA REDDY, NARASIMHAM
Deities of Sri Audinarayana Swamy and Anjenayaaswami Temples – Appellant
Versus
R. Hanumacharyulu – Respondent


REDDY, C. J.

( 1 ) THE question we are called upon to decide in these two petitions is as to the effect of cancellation of a certificate under Order XII, Rule 3 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1950.

( 2 ) THE deities of Sri Audinaraayanaswamy and Anjaneyaswami Temples of Donepudi represented by the Executive Officer, N. Mohana Rao, the petitioner in these petitions, obtained leave to 8 appeal to the supreme Court against the judgment of this Court in A. S. No. 591 of 1952. The petitioner had to furnish security and deposit the money required for preparation of books for the use of the Supreme Court before 18-12-1959. As he failed to do either till 4-3-1960 nor had he applied for extension of time, this Court cancelled the certificate granted on 6-11-1959. Shortly thereafter, the petitioner filed C. M. P. No. 4713 of 1960 for reviewing that order setting out the circumstances that prevented him from furnishing security and to make the necessary deposit.

( 3 ) WHEN this petition came on for hearing, an objection was raised by the learned counsel for competent, as the order sought to be reviewed was made under Order XII, Rule 3 of the Supreme Court Rules and not under anay of the provisio
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top