SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(AP) 168

JAGMOHAN REDDY, P.CHANDRA REDDY
Badrinarayan – Appellant
Versus
Excise Commissioner, Hyderabad – Respondent


CHANDRA READY, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed by the plaintiff in O. S. No. 148 of 1958 on the file of the City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against the Order of the fourth Additional Judge, City Civil Court, returning the plaint for presentation to the proper Court. The plaintiff was an Abkari contractor in 1360-F. for the villages of Vemulgunta and Lachamapur Khurd in the district of Nalgonda. A penalty of rs. 9,767-8-0 was imposed on him by the Excise Superintendent for the alleged tapping of 145 toddy and 500 sendhi trees without paying the excise-duty. He carried an appeal to the Collector, the appellate authority under the rules, against this levy and a further appeal to the Excise Commissioner unsuccessfully. He then sought to have this order revised by the Minister for Revenue and Excise. As this was also rejected, the appellant brought the aforesaid suit against the officials concerned and the Minister impugning the levy of penalty as being ultra vires, illegal and void.

( 2 ) VARIOUS defences were raised tp the suit but the one material for the purposes of the present enquiry is that the Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit, as the contract was entered into and ex










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top