SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(AP) 18

ANANTA NARAYANA AYYAR, P.SATYANARAYANA RAJU
Rajareddy Mallaram – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad – Respondent


AYYAR, J.

( 1 ) THE Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench has referred the following questions of law to this court under Section 66 (1) of the, Indian Income Tax Act:-" (I) On the facts and in the circumstances, of this case, was the order of assessment made by the Income Tax Officer under Section 23 (4) on 30-9-1953 bad in law? (ii) If the answer to the above question is in the negative, was not the applicant liable for the amount of tax payable, as determined in that order of assessment, by reason of Section 44 of the Income Tax Act"?

( 2 ) THE relevant facts of the case are as follows; Three persons, namely, (i) Baba Gowd, (ii) Pir-kit Venkata Raj Reddy and (iii) Raj Reddy Mallaram formed an association called "nizamabad Group Liquor Shops" (hereinafter referred to for the sake of convenience as Association) for the year 1358 Fasli and did business of liquor contract. The Association became dissolved at the end of 1358 Fasli. The Association ceased to exist altogether and the business done by it has been discontinued. On the facts concerned in this case, there does not seem to be any need to draw a distinction between discontinuance and dissolution, so far as the Associ


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top