SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(AP) 118

SRINIVASA CHARI, P.CHANDRA REDDY
Shakuntala – Appellant
Versus
M. B. Jaisoorya – Respondent


ANSARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is against the judgment of our learned brother, Ansari, J. The facts relating to this appeal briefly are that one Bhumayya, son of Sambiah, was the owner of house No. 489-16-B (new) known as "rukmini Vilas" situated in Mahubpura, Gowliguda, Hyderabad. The said Bhumiah executed a will on 23rd Isfanclar, 1349 Fasti ( 23/01/1940), under which he bequeathed the house by dividing it into three portions giving away two portions to his sons, who are defendants 1 and 2 in the case, and one portion to his wife, Rukkamma. Three rooms on the ground floor and three rooms on the top floor, marked red in the plan annexed to the will, were given over to the wife, while two rooms on the first floor and three rooms on the ground-floor, marked yellow in the plan were given over to the sons. The further recital in the will is to the effect that the upstairs of the house and three rooms on the ground floor were in the occupation of Dr. Bopardikar with whom the property had been mortgaged for a sum of Rs. 5000. 00, that a rental agreement had been taken from the mortgagee for a period of ten years under a stipulation that the rent payable by him was to be adjusted towards t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top