SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(AP) 131

SRINIVASA CHARI, P.CHANDRA REDDY
Government Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
Pachipulsu Venkata Subba Rao Vallamkonda Venkateswarlu – Respondent


CHANDRA REDDY, CJ.

( 1 ) THESE three revision petitions raise a common question as to the meaning of the word cloth used in the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 and the Hyderabad General Sales Tax Act, 1950. T. R. C. No. 20 of 1959 deals with the tormer Act while the other two revisions deal with the latter Act.

( 2 ) T. R. C. No. 20 of 1959.-The respondents, a firm of merchants, are dealers in cloth. They sold fine and superfine printed sarees during the year 1956-57, and the turnover amounted to Rs. 25,949-11-0 in this behalf. The Deputy Commercial Tax officer, Vijayawada, treating the sales as falling under item i of sub-sction 2-A of section 3 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act imposed sales tax at the rate of one anna six pies for every rupee of the turnover. The appeal of the assessee to the deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes proved unsuccessful. The assesse went in further appeal to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal accepted the contention of the assessee that sarees and dhoties would not embrace the definition contained in item 1 of section 3 (2-A) of the Madras General Tax Act and allowed the appeal: the Department seeks to revise this order under se










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top