SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(AP) 161

JAGMOHAN REDDY, P.CHANDRA REDDY
Goli Ramaswami – Appellant
Versus
Narla Jagannadha Rao – Respondent


CHANDRA REDDY, C. J.

( 1 ) THERE appeals arise out of two suits, O. S. Nos. 129 and 130 of 1951 respectively on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Tenali. Both the suits were filed for possession and future mesne profits. Though the plaintiffs are different, the defendants are the same in both the suits, the main facts being common to both. The two suits were tried together with the consent of parties and the evidence was recorded in O. S. No. 129 of 1951 as per the joint memo. , dated 10th January, 1955. The plaintiffs are residents of Perala and Chirala, two adjoining villages, while the defendants belong to a place called Pallekona. The properties in dispute are situated in Konetipuram. According to the plaintiffs, the two sale deeds, marked as Exhibits A-26 and A-27 were executed in favour of the two plaintiffs, the extent of the land covered by each of the sale deeds being i acre 92 cents and 676 square links, and the consideration recited in each being Rs. 7,000. The negotiation for these sales were initiated by one Perumallu, who is examined as P. W. 11, at the request of the two plaintiffs.

( 2 ) THE properties in dispute were originally acquired by the mother

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top