SRINIVASA CHARI, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order of the District Munsif of Kurnool, dismissing the petitioners application for review of his order dated 4-4-1958. The 1st petitioner is the father and the second petitioner is the daughter who filed a suit in forma pauperis for the recovery of damages for the loss sustained on the allegation that the second petitioners mother was knocked down by a lorry belonging to the defendant and was killed. The petitioners filed the present suit for recovery of damages from the defendant This suit was filed in forma pauperis. This petition to sue in forma pauperis was opposed by the respondent firstly on the ground that the petitioners had no locus standi, he disputed the fact alleged in the plaint, that the 1st petitioner was the husband of the deceased and that the 2nd petitioner was born to the 1st petitioner and the deceased. The fact that the 1st petitioner was not in a position to pay the court-fee was also disputed. The petitioners examined in support of their pauperism petitioner No. 1 as P. W. 1. On behalf of the respondent, three witnesses were examined viz. , R. W. 1 Karnam, R. W. 2 Respondent himself and R. W. 3 w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document