ANANTA NARAYANA AYYAR
V. R. Venugopal – Appellant
Versus
T. Pankajam – Respondent
( 1 ) MISS T. Pankajam filed a private complaint against one V. R. Venugopal charging the latter with having committed offence under Section 417 I. P. C. in the court of the Vlth City Magistrate, Hyderabad. The learned Magistrate took the case on file under Section 417 I. P. C. The Advocate for [the accused in the trial court raised certain preliminary objection about jurisdiction and contended that the accused should be discharged straightway. The learned trial Magistrate considered the pre-liminary objection and passed an order dated 13-1-1960 holding that her court had jurisdiction to try the case and that there was no need to discharge the accused at that stage. The accused filed Criminal R. p. No. 53 of 1960 against that order in the Court of the Chief City Magistrate-Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. The latter dismissed the revision petition, observing as follows: "it is only the High Court that can interfere with the orders passed regarding jurisdiction of the Court. Hence, the petitioner should approach the High Court to set aside the order of the lower court if he is entitled to get it set aside. Thereupon, the accused has filed this petition praying that th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.