SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(AP) 256

ANANTA NARAYANA AYYAR
Patchamatla Venkata Subbayamma – Appellant
Versus
Kocherlapati Rajayya – Respondent


ANATHANARAYANA AYYAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition to revise the order of the Subordinate Judge, Amalapuram in O. S. No. 33 of 1957 on his file. ( relevant facts are briefly as follows: The petitioner is the first defendant and the respondent is the plaintiff in O. S. No. 33 of 1957. Plaintiff filed that suit for possession of plaint A and B schedule properties, after ejecting the defendants there from and for future profits. After the plaint had been presented, an objection had been taken by the office that the valution of the properties was low. There upon, the plaintiff produced registered sale deeds showing a valution between Rs. 500/ to Rs. 1000/ per acre. The plaintiff also represented that the Village Munsif was one of the defendants in the suit and as such, she could not secure certificates of the village officers with regard to the valution of the suit properties. The Head Ministerial Officer put upan office note dated 20-1-1957 to this effect before the predecessor of the learned Subordinate Judge for orders regarding the court fee. That learned Judge heard the plaintiff and finally passed an order on 25-9-1957, as follows: "heard Sri R. V. He filed another sale deed for we




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top