SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(AP) 268

ANANTA NARAYANA AYYAR
Motamarii Ramaiah – Appellant
Versus
Malliah – Respondent


ANATHANARAYANA AYYAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition to revisetheorder of the District Munisif, Mabbubabad dated in E. A. No. 24 of 1951 in E. P. No. 21 of 1955 in O. S. No. 124 of 1353 F.

( 2 ) THE material facts are briefly these: The petitioner are the decree-holders in O. S. No. 124/1353 F. on the file of the District Munsiff, Mahbubabad. Kumari Baliga, the third respondent here in is the sole Judgement-debtor. Respondents 2 and 3 as well as the father of the 1st respondent were brothers. In 1916, the ancestor of the petitioners and the father of respondents 2 and 3, Kumari Ramiah purchased the land in Survey 3, Kumari Ramiah purchased of land in Survey No. 355 and someother land. In 1334 Fasli the father of respondent 2 and 3 executed an unregistered sale deed in favour of the father of the petitioners. In 1940, therewas a lease, Ex. B-11 by the petitioners in favour of the third respondent. Subsequently in 1942, there was dispute between the third respondent and the petitioners regarding possession of the land. The Petitioners contended in that case that, after the termination of the leaseex. B-11, they had taken over possession from the third respondent and that they continued t


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top