SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(AP) 77

SRINIVASA CHARI, P.CHANDRA REDDY, P.SATYANARAYANA RAJU
Padala Satyanarayana Murthy – Appellant
Versus
Padala Gangamma – Respondent


( 1 ) THE question to be answered in this case is whether Section 77 of the Indian Registration Act bars a suit on the basis of an unregistered will when the Sub-Registrar refused to admit it for registration, which order was confirmed on appeal by the District Registrar.

( 2 ) THE facts leading up to the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal lie in a narrow compass and could be stated in the following words. The appellant sought to sue in forma pauperis for recovery of the properties belonging to one Padala Paddireddi, who died on 6-8-1953, possessed of the same and leaving behind him his wife and two daughters and his younger brother, the plaintiff, averring that Paddireddi executed his last will and testament two days prior to his death bequeathing most of his properties to the plaintiff. The will was presented in the Sub-Registrars Office at Kothapeta. On an objection taken by the widow and the daughters of Paddireddi, registration was refused on 19-3-1954. This order of refusal was confirmed by the District Registrar on appeal. Thereupon he filed a petition under Order 33 Rule 2, C. P. C. for permission to file the suit in forma pauperis.

( 3 ) THE petition was rejected by the Subordinat























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top