SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(AP) 85

JAGMOHAN REDDY, S.QAMAR HASSAN
Pamulapati Bhushayya – Appellant
Versus
Kommareddy Chinnapareddi – Respondent


REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the 2nd defendant against the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge, Guntur, passed in favour of the plaintjff-1st respondent. 2nd respondent is the 1st defendant. Plaintiff-1st respondent had filed a suit on promissory note executed by the appellant and the 2nd respondent on the allegation that he and the appellant carried on tobacco business jointly in the year 1948 and in connection therewith, the appellant had to pay certain amount to him. As there were differences, the matter was referred to mediators and an amount of Rs. 8,000. 00was settled as being due to the 1st respondent by the appellant, who along with the 2nd respondent agreed to and executed a promissory note on 24-6-1950 for that amount payable with interest at 9 per cent per annum from that date till the date of payment. As the defendants failed to pay in spite of repeated demands orally and by a registered notice Ex. A-5 dated 5-6-1951, 1st respondent filed the suit O. S. No. 18 of 1953. Defendants 3 and 4 who are the brothers of the 2nd defendant were also added as supplemental defendants as per the order on I. A. No. 848 of 1953, but were given up at the time of trial b






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top