SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(AP) 150

P.SATYANARAYANA RAJU, MUNI KANNIAH
Vakati Venkatasubba Reddi – Appellant
Versus
Pelleti Pitchamma – Respondent


( 1 ) THE plaintiff who claimed to be entitled to a 1/3rd share in the plaint B and C schedule properties did not succeed in establishing that he is a member of a composite family consisting of two Vakati families and one Pelleti family. Hence the appeal by the plaintiff.

( 2 ) THE relationship between the parties needs mention to explain their array in the suit. The 1st defendant is Pelleti Pitchamma, Her brothers were Vakati Venkatasubba Reddi and Subbaraghava Reddi. Their father wag Venkata Kumundara Reddi. The plaintiff is the son of Subbaraghnva Reddi who died in 1941. Venfcatasubba Reddi predeceased Subbaraghava Reddi leaving his wile Subbalakshmamma. Pitchamma (1st defendant) married Pelleti Muniswami Reddi, the son of Pelleti Venkata Narayana Reddi and Mahalakshmamma, who died in 1930. Pitcbamma had a son Munirami Reddi who died in 1939. Her daughter Muniamma is married to one Rami Reddi. Pitchammas aunt Vengarnma i. e. , Pelleti Venkata Narayana Reddis sister, was married to one Vekati Appa Reddi. These bad a son Ramaswami Reddi and his wife is the 2nd defendant. The genealogical table of the three families is set out herennder for purposes of amplification.

( 3 ) THE case












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top