SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(AP) 198

S.QAMAR HASSAN, JAGMOHAN REDDY
Mareddi Venkata Rami Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Mareddi Adinarayana Reddy – Respondent


QAMAR HASAN, J.

( 1 ) APPEAL No. 627 of 1954 on the file of this Court in which the question was whether the trial court was right in decreeing the suit for specific performance of contract of sale, was dismissed by our judgment d/- 24-4-59. Therein we, however, granted a fresh-period of three months to enable the successful plaintiff to deposit the balance of purchase price amounting to Rs. 75,000/ from the date of the judgment. Plaintiff, the petitioner herein deposited Rs. 53,500/ in the trial court on 24-7-1959 which was the last day of the extended time granted by us. In order to enable him to. deposit the remaining balance of Rs. 21,500/ he filed the present civil miscellaneous petition praying that on the facts and grounds affirmed in the accompanying affidavit, an extension of time may be granted to him by three weeks from 24-7-1959. We are informed that during the pendency of the petition, the petitioner has by 4-8-1959 deposited Rs. 21,500/ in the trial court. Be that as it may, the contention of the contesting opponents as advanced by the learned Advocate General in resistance of the petition is that this court undoubtedly has power to extend the time for payment of the





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top