( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the Addl. Commissioner for Workmens Compensation, Andhra, D/- 30-5-1958. awarding compensation to the respondent in a sum of Rs. 1260. 00 for the loss of his lett fore-arm below the joint. The circumstances in which the claim for compensation arose are briefly as follows: The appellant was the owner of the Saw Mill at Vijayavada, in which the respondent, Lakshmayya, was employed as a worker. On 1-7-1955 as usual, the respondent was working at the Saw Mill. His duties, according to the appellant, were those of a helper. It is pointed out that usually four persons are employed to work at the Saw Mill in question --one is the cutter, whose duty it is to teed the saw mill and push the logs to be cut by pressing the wine against the saw in motion. There are two workers, who stand on either-side ot the saw to ensure that the cut logs are collected and returned to the cutter to enable him to do a second or further cutting of the logs in question. The helper i. e. , the respondent is supposed to help the cutter as well as the workers. Primarily, his duty is to stand on the opposite side of the saw and receive th