SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(AP) 15

P.SATYANARAYANA RAJU
K. Ranganayakulu – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Commissioner, Vijayawada Municipality – Respondent


P. SATYANARAYANA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution, for the issue of a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or order restraining the vijayawada Municipality from proceeding with the action threatened in and by its notice dated 22-2-1956.

( 2 ) THE facts which have given rise to this writ petition are simple and are not in controversy. The petitioner owns a saw-mill at Vijayawada. On an application made by him to the Commissioner of the Vijayawada Municipality on 12-9-1948, under Section 250 of the Madras District Municipalities Act, he was granted permission to install electric driven machinery for the saw-mill, Pursuant to the permission so granted, the petitioner has been running the saw-mill and renewal licences under Section 249 of the District Municipalities Act were being applied for and granted.

( 3 ) ON 20-3-1952, the petitioner applied for permission under Section 250 of the district Municipalities Act for installing an additional 10 H. P. electric motor in the vacant premises contiguous to the premises in which he was already accorded permission to install the electric machinery for the purpose of running the saw-mill. It is









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top