SANJEEVA ROW NAIDU
Yenduri Radhakrishnamurthy – Appellant
Versus
G. Mahalatchayya – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a revision petition preferred against the order of the Additional District Magistrate, Krishna, in Criminal Revision Petition No. 24 of 1956 by which he directed as follows:"the implied order of dismissal is set aside and the case is transferred to the Stationary Sub-Magistrate Vijayawada Taluk for fresh inquiry and disposal according to law. The petition is allowed. "
( 2 ) IN this case, the complainant filed a com-plaint making various allegations therein under Sections 323, 325, 447 and 34, I. P. C. In that complaint there is an allegation that the first blow which the 2nd accused dealt on the left cheek of the complainant resulted in one of her teeth dropping down. This allegation prima facie implies that the tooth dropped down having been dislodged out of its position-under the impact of the blow given. Since there is an allegation of dislocation of the tooth on account of the violence employed or criminal force used, the allegation would prima facie be regarded as disclosing the offence under Section 325, I. P. C. This may be the reason why the Magistrate at that time took the complaint on file without any amendment of the sections on which the comp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.