Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : MOHAMMED AHMED ANSARI, SRINIVASA CHARI
Kapur Chand - Appellant
Versus
Kanji - Respondent
Decided On : 08-14-58
WAIVER OF NOTICE TO QUIT - TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 - SECTION 111(H), 113 - LEASE - TENANCY FROM MONTH TO MONTH - ACCEPTANCE OF RENT AFTER EXPIRY OF NOTICE TO QUIT - EFFECT - LANDLORD'S INTENTION TO TREAT LEASE AS SUBSISTING - CONSENSUS AD IDEM NOT NECESSARY.
Fact of the Case:
The plaintiff filed a suit for eviction of the defendant from a shop, alleging that the defendant was a tenant on a monthly rental basis and that a notice to quit was served on him on 11-4-1953. The defendant admitted the execution of the rent deed but claimed that it related to a different shop and that he was a tenant on a 10-year lease. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the appellate court set aside the judgment and decreed the suit. The defendant appealed to the High Court, which remanded the case for further evidence on the issue of whether the plaintiff had received rents after the termination of the tenancy.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court held that the defendant was a tenant from month to month, as he was unable to establish the existence of a 10-year lease. The court further held that the plaintiff's acceptance of rent for seven months after the expiry of the notice to quit amounted to a waiver of the notice and that the defendant could not be evicted.
Issues: 1. Whether the defendant was a tenant from month to month or had a 10-year lease. 2. Whether the plaintiff's acceptance of rent after the expiry of the notice to quit amounted to a waiver of the notice.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. Under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, a lease of immovable property for other than agricultural purposes is deemed to be a lease from month to month in the absence of a contract to the contrary. 2. Section 113 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 provides that a notice to quit is waived with the express or implied consent of the person to whom it is given by an act on the part of the person giving it, showing an intention to treat the lease as subsisting. 3. The acceptance of rent by the landlord after the expiry of the notice to quit is an act showing an intention to treat the lease as subsisting and amounts to a waiver of the notice.
Final Decision: The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment of the District Judge, and restored the judgment of the trial court, dismissing the plaintiff's suit for eviction.
( 2 ) THE facts briefly are that one Kanji instituted a suit against Kapurchand for eviction from shop No. 6 situated in Sirpur, basing the suit on a rent note said to have been executed by the said Kapur Chand on 1-10-1950. It was alleged that the premises was taken on a rental of Rs. 30. 00 per mensem and that the tenancy had expired and that a notice was given to quit on 11-4-1953 and inasmuch as the tenant failed to vacate, the present suit was instituted for ejectment. The tenant who is the appellant before us admitted the execution of the rent deed but said that it related to shop No. 7 and not shop No. 6. With regard to the premises bearing No. 6, the defendant contended that he was tenant on a rental agreement for a period of 10 years and that the landlord was with-holding that rental agreement deliberately. After trial, the trial court dismissed the plaintiffs suit. On appeal the appellate court set aside the judgment of the lower Court and decreed the. suit. Aggrieved by this Judgment the tenant took the matter in appeal to the High Court and it was at the stage of the hearing before the High Court the case was remanded for further evidence on a fresh issue framed by the High Court on which, findings have been given by the lower appellate court.
( 3 ) IT has to be stated that the stand taken by the defendant tenant in answer to the suit of the plaintiff was that he held the suit premises on a tenancy basis for period of 10 years. This plea of his amounted to this that he was not liable to be evicted for a period of 10 years. It happened that when the case came up before the High Court in Second Appeal the defendant craved leave to amend his written statement in order to add an alternative plea to say that the plaintiff was not entitled to evict him by reason of his having accepted the rents after the termination of the tenancy. This plea was not raised as such in the written statement but the defendant had tiled receipts given by the landlord for rents due subsequent to the period after the termination of the tenancy. Therefore there was already material on record for forming the basis for the alternative plea. Although with regard to this question as to whether the landlord received rents subsequent to the termination of die lease the lower appellate Court was directed to enquire into the matter, the matter as to whether the defendant should be allowed to amend his written statement by reason of a further alternative plea was left open. This matter was urged before us and we permitted the defendant to amend his written statement on condition that he paid Rs. 50. 00 as costs to the landlord, because it was an alternative plea raised by the defendant on the material already on record. We were of the opinion that in the circumstances the defendant could be allowed to raise the plea with the permission of the Court.
( 4 ) THE only point which requires consideration now by this Court at this stage is as to whether by reason of the landlord having accepted rents after the expiry of the period of tenancy he was debarred from ejecting the tenant. In other words did this act of the landlord in accepting rents after the notice to quit and termination of the tenancy amount in law to waiver of the notice to quit.
( 5 ) IT would be useful to refer to the relevant provisions of the Transfer of Property Act relating to the termination of tenancy and leases. Ordinarily under Section 111 of the T.
Gooderham and Works Ltd. v. Canadiam Broadcasting Corporation
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.