SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(AP) 195

P.SATYANARAYANA RAJU, SRINIVASA CHARI, P.CHANDRA REDDY, JAGMOHAN REDDY
B. Veeraswamy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


SATYANARAYANA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) ). The following question has been referred to the Full Bench: "whether the State Government can authorise the Regional Transport Officer to exercise the powers and discharge the functions of the State Transport Authority under Sections 48-A, 51-A and 56-A of the Motor Vehicles Act?

( 2 ) THE factes relevant for the consideration of the question may he stated: Respondents 3 and 4 are holders of two stage carriage permits on the route Gujjanagundla to Old Guntur via Stall Girls School. By their applications, dated 5/05/1956, they applied to the Regional Transport Officer, Guntur for variation of the route by extending it to Nambur Railway Station. In his proceedings, dated 22/08/1956, the Regional Transport Officer refused the applications of respondents 3 and 4 to extend the route. The two operators thereupon preferred revision petitions to the Government of Andhra. By their order dated 24/10/1956, the Government set aside the order of the Regional Transport Officer and directed him to grant the extension of the route. The propriety of the Government Order is the subject-matter of these Petitions, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution.

( 3 ) ). Abou


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top