( 1 ) THIS appeal arises in a suit filed on the foot of a promissory note executed by the appellant before us in favour of one Hanmant Reddy, Two persons filed a suit viz. , plaintiff No. 1 and plaintiff No. 2 Hanmanth Ready, plaintiff 1 being related to plaintiff 2 as his mother-in-law. The plaint allegation was that the 1st plaintiff had money lending business and that she advanced a sum of Rs. 7350. 00 to the defendant and took a promissory note in the name of her son-in-law the second plaintiff. She alleged that the amount of the suit promissory note was not repaid in spite of repeated demands and hence the present suit had to be filed. The second plaintiff stated that the facts set out in the plaint were true and consented to a decree being passed in favour of the 1st plaintiff. The defendant in his written statement contended that the suit promissory note was not true and also pleaded want of consideration. He also pleaded that plaintiff 1 could not sue on the promissory note as she was not the holder thereof. He stated that inasmuch as the 2nd plaintiff had not paid the money, he was not entitled to any decree. The trial court framed the following issues; 1. Whether the suit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document