SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(AP) 193

Neti Gopalakrishna Gokhale – Appellant
Versus
Brahmandam Narasimham – Respondent


SUBBA RAO, CJ.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise out of O. S. No. 73 of 1950 on the file of the District Munsif s Court, Tenali, a suit filed by the ist respondent for a permanent injunction restraining the 4th defendant from assigning or otherwise alienating the suit site and "for a mandatory injunction directing defendants 1 to 3 to remove the encroachment. over the said site.

( 2 ) TO appreciate the facts and the contentions of the parties, it will be convenient and necessary, at the outset, to notice the topography of the locality in question wherein the impugned encroachment is alleged to have been made. In Tenali town, in Ward No. 7 one of the main roads Satyanarayana Park Road runs from north to south. An equally important road called Andhra Ratna Road runs from west to east. The plaintiff s house is situated at the corner which the Andhra ratna Road makes with Satyanarayana Park Road. Satyanarayana Park Road abuts the plaintiff s house on the east whereas the Andhra Ratna Road abuts it on the south. The width of the Andhra Ratna Road is 57 feet and that part of the road abutting the permises of the plaintiff is about 165 feet. The plaintiff has been using these premises for man





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top