SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(AP) 279

Veeranna – Appellant
Versus
Sayamma – Respondent


SRINIVASACHARI, J.

( 1 ) THE respondent filed a suit for the recovery of possession of the suit property against her husband on the allegation that her father was the pattadar of the suit properties and after the death of her father, she became entitled to them. She alleged that her husband had wrongfully got the patta of the lands transferred in his name professing to be the illatom son-in-law. A suit was filed by the wife, the plaintiff herein for the cancellation of the patta and her being granted the patta and in that suit the question as to whether the defendant-respondent was the illatom son-in-law of the deceased was agitated and it was held that he was not the illatom son-in-law and the suit was decreed in favour of the wife (the daughter of the deceased ). Proceedings under section 145, Criminal Procedure code, were started by the appellant which ended in favour of the appellant. He obtained possession of the lands in pursuance of the order of the Criminal Court. The wife thereupon filed the present suit for a declaration and possession of the suit lands. The suit was resisted on the same grounds that the defendant was the illatom son-in-law and the plaintiff had no right.























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top