K.SUBBA RAO, SRINIVASA CHARI
Gangadharabhatla Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Mudi Narayanaswamy – Respondent
( 2 ) THE facts are clearly and succinctly stated by our learned brother, Bhimasankaram J. in his order. They are :
( 3 ) THE appellant is the accused in C. C. No. 297 of 1956 on the file of the Additional First Class Magistrate, Kakinada. He was elected as a member of the village panchayat of Yeleswaram, East Godavari District, at a general election which took place on 23-6-195 he was appointed by the District Panchayat Officer, Kakinada, by an order dated 30-6-1956 to act as the temporary President of the meeting of all the members so elected for the purpose of co-opting a woman member as prescribed by Section 10-A of the Madras Village Panchayats Act (Act X of 1950 ). The meeting was held on 11-7-1956 and the appellant declared one T. Nukamma as having been duly co-opted and made an entry to that effect in the minutes book. The first respondent, who was also one of the Members elected to the pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.