( 1 ) DEFENDANTS, husband and wife, are the appellants in this second appeal which is preferred against a decree granting a mandatory injunction directing them to remove a cross-wall and certain other sti uctures from the portion ABNM of the pathway marked A. B. C. D. in the plan attached to the decree and a permanent injunction restraining them fiom obstructing the free passage of the plaintiffs through the lane A. B. C. D. The lane ABCD was originally a part of a large block of land belonging to one Cherukuru Subba Rao who divided it into several plots and sold them as building sites to different individuals some of whom have subsequently built houses thereon. The lane A. B. C. D. is 9 feet wide and runs between and along the whole length of the backyards of two rows of sites and houses situated to the north and south. The lane A. B. C. D. opens into a public road both on the east and the west, at the places indicated as C. D. and A. B. respectively. The defendants house P. N. B. B1 is situate north of the lane at its westernmost extremity. The portion of the lane just behind the house P. N. B. B1, is marked as A. B. N. M. and it is on this plot A. B. N. M. that the structures c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document