SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(AP) 44

K.SUBBA RAO
YENDRU SATYAVATAMMA – Appellant
Versus
GUNDAPUNEEDI PADMAVATAMMA – Respondent


K. SUBBA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Second Appeal against the decree and judgment of the Court of the Additional Subordinate Judge of Kakinada, confirming that of the district Munsif, Kakinada in a suit for redemption of a mortgage and for possession. One Ramineedi Govindarao and his sons executed a usufructuary mortgage in respect of the plaint schedule lands for Rs. 3,000/-in favour of the defendant on 17-11-1947. Underthedocument, it was agreed that the amount would be paid within a period of ten years from the date of execution i. e. by the end of November 1957 and that, if within the stipulated period the mortgagors paid the principal amount due under the deed in full discharge of the debt, the mortgagee should enjoy the schedule-mentioned property paying every year the fixed maktha to the mortgagors. The plaintiff purchased the equity of redemption from the mortgagors and filed O. S. No. 429 of 1951 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif, Kakinada for recovery of possession and for other incidental reliefs. The defendant, inter, alia, contended that the suit was premature as it was filed before the expiry of the term fixed under the mortgage deed, namely 30-11-1957. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top