SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(AP) 107

Pilla Venugopalam – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Vijayawada Municipality – Respondent


VISWANATHA SASTRI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition by three rate-payers and electors of the Vijayawada Municipalty praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents, the Commissioner of Vijayawada Municipality and the Regional inspector of Municipal Councils and Local Boards, not to hold the municipal elections for Wards Nos. 7, 12, 15 and 30 of the Municipality on 26th March, 1956, as notified by them. It is common ground that the Councillors elected at the last ordinary elections for these Wards vacated their seats, for one reason or another, before their term of three years was over and that casual vacancies as defined in section 3 (7) of the Madras District Municipalities Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") occurred in the office of councillors for these wards before October, 1955. It is to fill up these casual vacancies that casual elections have been fixed to be held on 26th March, 1956. There were earlier attempts by some of the ratepayers by means of suits in the District Munsif s Court, Vijayawada, to restrain the respondents from holding elections for filling up these casual vacancies but they proved unsuccessful.

( 2 ) UNDER section 8 (1) of the Ac

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top