SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(AP) 83

Maddi Narayanam and Bro. a Firm at Gudivada – Appellant
Versus
Kanumuri Subbaraju, proprietor, Sri Dhanalakshmi Rice Mill, a firm at Razole – Respondent


Maddi Narayanam and Bro. a Firm at Gudivada Vs. Kanumuri Subbaraju, proprietor, Sri Dhanalakshmi Rice Mill, a firm at Razole

SUBBA RAO, CJ.

( 1 ) THIS is a Letters Patent Appeal against the Judgment of Chandra Reddy, J. , dismissing the Second Appeal filed against the decree and Judgment of the Subordinate Judge of Amalapuram, confirming that of the District Munsif, razole, in O. S. No. 2 of 1945, a suit filed by the appellants for dissolution of the partnership and for settlement of accounts of the suit firm.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFFS 2 and 3 are brothers and members of a trading family carrying on business in partnership with the 5th defendant under the name and style of Maddi narayanam and brother. Defendants 2 to 4 are brothers and members of another trading family carrying on business at Tekisettipalem under the name and style of Sri Dhanalakshmi Rice Mill, proprietor Kanumuri Subbaraju. The former firm is the ist plaintiff and the latter the ist defendant. Defendants 1 to 4 owned a mill at Tekisettipalem but they were not able to work it properly for want of funds. They, therefore, entered into a partnership with the plaintiffs and the 5th defendant for working the rice mill under the



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top