SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(AP) 139

VISWANATHA SASTRY
NIDUMUKKALA SRIRAMAMURTY – Appellant
Versus
PATCHIPULUSU VENKATASUBBA RAO – Respondent


VISWANATHA SASTRY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition for revision of the order of the District Munsif of Vijayawada in I. A. No. 2978 of 1953 in O. S. No. 174 of 1952 directing P. Venkata subba Rao to be made a party defendant to the suit in spite of the opposition of the plaintiff, Nidumukkala Sreeramamurthy. The facts are shortly these: the plaintiff s father had instituted O. S. No. 265 of 1945 on the file of the district Munsif s Court, Bezwada against Sri Kanyakaparameswari Anna Satram committee, represented by its 35 members as defendants, for an injunction restraining the defendants from closing certain windows and obstructing or diminishing the access of light and air through those windows to the plaintiff s house and for a mandatory injunction to pull down the obstruction erected by the defendants above the level of the ancient lights claimed by the plaintiff in that suit. There was a compromise in the suit entered into between the plaintiff s father, Nidumukkala Subbarayudu and Gopu Seshavataram, the 1st defendant in that suit and the president of Sri Kanyaka Parameswari Anna Satram Committee. According to the plaintiff in the present suit, the Anna Satram Committee was again tr







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top