SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(AP) 123

K.SUBBA RAO, VISWANATHA SASTRY
SRIMATHI HARADEVI – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


VISWANATHA SASTRY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the order of Satyanarayana Raju J. dismissing an application for the issue of a writ of certiorari quashing the order of the collector and Additional District Magistrate, Kurnool dated 31-12-1953 requisitioning a house alleged to belong to the petitioner and made under sec. 4 (1) of the Requisition of Buildings (Andhra Area) Ordinance (I of 1953), the petitioner before the learned Judge, who is also the appellant before us, is Haradevi, the wife of Pamandas Sugnaram, a Banker and money-lender residing and carrying on business in Kurnool town. At the relevant date the petitioner and her husband were either the owners or the lessees of four houses in Kurnool town which have been referred to, for the sake of conveniene, as houses A, B, C and D in the judgment of the learned Judge. Houses A and g were rented buildings in which Sugnaram, the lessee, was carrying on his business. The title of the houses B and D stands in the name of Haradevi. On 14-9-1953 the Collector and the Additional Dirstrict Magistrate, Kurnool, the 2nd respondent, requested Sugnaram by a notice, to vacate house B and occupy house A for his residence and busines







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top