( 1 ) 1. I agree with the conclusions reached by my learned brother, but having regard to the importance of one of the questions involved in this appeal, I would like to say something in regard thereto. The material facts are set out in his judgment and it is not necessary for me to state them once again except to give a brief resume for appreciation of the problems arising herein. The suit giving rise to this appeal was instituted for recovering possession of plaint A scheduled properties or alternatively for a sufficient extent of the peoperties in the B schedule from the share of defendants 4 and 6 and equal in the aggregate to the plaint A scheduled properties in all respects and for profits. The 6th defendant is the husband of the plaintiff, the 4th defendant being their adopted son. 1st defendant is the natural father of the 4th defendant and brother of 6th defendant, defedants 2, 3 and 5 being the sons of the 1st defendant. The 6th defendant having had no children thought of taking the 4th defendant his brother s son in adoption in the year 1941. His wife was against this adoption being anxious that some one of her own relations should be chosen for that pur