SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(AP) 168

BHIMASANKARAM, K.SUBBA RAO
M. V. JOGARAO – Appellant
Versus
State OF MADRAS (NOW ANDHRA) REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, KURNOOI – Respondent


( 1 ) JUDGMENT of the Court delivered by the Hon ble The Chief Justice. This is an appeal against the order of our learned brother Satyanarayana Raju j. dismissing the application filed by the appellant under Article 226 of the constitution of India to quesh the order of the Government dismissing him from service.

( 2 ) THE appellant was a permanent Tahsildar of Visakhapatnam District. It was brough to the notice of the Government by appropriate departments that a pritma facie case of corruption was made out against him. The matter was in due course entrusted to the Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings for enquiry. The allegations against the appellant were that when he was working as Special Tahsildar for xoans, he took illegal gratifications in 9 instances from the applicants lor loins of the village of Narava and its hamlets and in four instances from the applicants of the village of Kanithi. The Tribunal framed charges and held an elaborate enquiry. The enquiry was held along with that of another Government servant one Thakoor jee who was during the crucial period the Special Revenue Inspector for Loans in the same place. The Tribunal held that five acts of corruption had been



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top