( 1 ) THIS is a revision against the judgment of the Munsif, Huzuroagar, dismissing the suit under section 9 of the SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 filed by the Revision-Petitioner on the ground that Section 99 of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands act (XXI of 1950), bars the jurisdiction of the Civil Court. The learned Munsif held that the revision-petitioner had admitted in certain revenue proceedings that the respondent was his tenant and presumably applying Section 37 of the Hyderabad tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, came to the conclusion that the respondent was a protected tenant within the meaning of that section and consequently, (though he does not say so in so many words) he very probably thought that landlords should apply to the Tahsildar under Section 32 (2) instead of seeking a remedy in a Civil Court, the jurisdiction of which, accotding to him, is barred by section 99. Section 99 is as follows :" (1) Save as provided in this Act no Civil Court shall have jurisdiction to settle, decide or deal with any question which is by or under this Act required to be settled, decided or dealt with by the Tahsildar, Tribunal or Collector or by the Board o