BHIMASANKARAM, K.SUBBA RAO
Subba Raju – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras, (Now Hyderabad) – Respondent
( 2 ) THE assessee is described as a firm of Military contractor doing business at Tradepalligudem, West Godavari District. For the assessment year 1944-45, the firm returned an income of Rs. 19,639. 00 on the basis of their accounts. The Income-tax Officer called for their accounts. The Income-tax Officer called for their accounts and on examination found that they were defective. So rejecting their estimate, he added a sum of Rs. 54,455. 00 to the income returned. There was an appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioiner and a further appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as a result of which the sum to be added was resulted to Rs. 35,354. 00. Three reasons for rejecting the account books were assigned by the Income Tax Authorities: (1) There was evidence that out of the coal supplied by the Government to enable the assessee to perform a contract, the assessee sold to a private to perform a contract, the assessee sold to a private party the two waggon loads of coal for Rs,1,000
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.