SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(AP) 38

Gatla China Nagi Reddi – Appellant
Versus
Obulusetti Markondaiah – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ calling for the records in original Petition, No. 2 of 1953 on the file of the Election Commissioner (District Munsif) Gurazala, relating to the election of the Panchayat Board, Kandlakunta, and to quash the order, dated 28th August, 1953, therein.

( 2 ) THE election of the President and members of (he Panchayat Board of Kandlakunta village was held on 29th January, 1953. It is not now in dispute that for the presidentship of the Panchayat Board there were two candidates who filed nomination papers before 9 A. M. They are Markondiah and Panakala Reddi. Markondaiah filed a written objection that the father s name of Panakala Reddi was not correctly noted in the voters list and hence his nomination paper could not be accepted. After scrutiny and verification, the Election Officer upheld the objection of Markondaiah and rejected the nomination of Panakala Reddi. At this stage it may be mentioned that the 1st respondent s case is that after so rejecting the nomination of Panakala Reddi, the Election Officer called for fresh nominations, which he was not en




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top