SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(AP) 263

Prabhala Suryanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Prabhala Sreeramachandramurti – Respondent


( 1 ) THE question raised in this Civil Revision Petition is whether an application for ascertainment of mesne profits and for the passing of a final decree in a suit for partition, for mesne profits and for accounts is governed by Article 181 of the Limitation Act. The suit was filed by the respondent for partition of the plaint A and B scheduled properties and for delivery of one such share to the plaintiff and for mesne profits and accounts, and it was decreed on 20th February, 1948. The petition giving rise to this Civil Revision Petition was presented on 13th July, 1953, before the Subordinate Judge, Vijayawada, for the appointment of a commissioner for ascertainment of mesne profits and for the passing of a finaldecree. The petition was opposed by the judgment-debtors on the ground that it was barred by limitation as obviously it was beyond three years of the passing of the preliminary dicree. The basis of this defence was Article 181 of the Limitation act.

( 2 ) THE above objection was overruled by the trial Court which thought the petition did not fall within the scope of Article 181 of the Limitation Act. For this conclusion reliance was placed on a judgment of the Calcutt





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top