Andhra Pradesh High Court
Kesavarapu Venkateswarlu - Appellant
Versus
Sreedharala Satyanarayana - Respondent
Decided On : 12-20-55
APPELLATE JURISDICTION - DIVISION BENCH - COMPETENCE TO HEAR APPEALS NOT EXCEEDING RS. 7,500 IN VALUE - APPELLATE SIDE RULES, RULES 1 AND 2 - CONSTRUCTION - JURISDICTION OF SINGLE JUDGE AND DIVISION BENCH - EFFECT OF HEARING APPEAL BY DIVISION BENCH WITHOUT REFERENCE BY SINGLE JUDGE.
Fact of the Case:
The issue before the court was whether a Division Bench of two Judges was competent to hear a first appeal not exceeding Rs. 7,500 in value when it was not referred to it by a single Judge under Rule 1 of the Appellate Side Rules.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that a Division Bench of two Judges was not incompetent to hear such an appeal, but its competence was legally defective, but the defect was not material to the parties to the appeal as such.
Issues: 1. Is a Bench of two Judges competent to hear a first appeal not exceeding Rs. 7,500 in value when it is not referred to it by a single Judge under Rule 1 of the Appellate Side Rules? 2. In any case, what is the effect of the hearing of such an appeal by a Bench without objection having been taken by the parties to such hearing?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted Rules 1 and 2 of the Appellate Side Rules together and held that the proviso appearing in Rule 1 was really a proviso to both the Rules. 2. The court held that the clause in Rule 2 "except those mentioned in Rule " should be construed as meaning "except those mentioned in Rule 1 subject to the proviso therein." 3. The court held that a Bench of two Judges would be violating the statutory rules and exercising irregularly the jurisdiction of the High Court if they hear and determine a first appeal not exceeding Rs. 7,500 in value, without the appeal being referred by a single Judge under Rule 1. 4. The court held that the irregularity in the exercise of jurisdiction was not one which affected any private right of the parties to the appeal.
Final Decision: The court answered the first question referred to it as follows: A Bench of two Judges is not incompetent to hear such an appeal; its competence is legally defective but the defect is not material to the parties to the appeal as such.
( 1 ) THIS appeal does not exceed Rs. 7,500 in value. It is objected by Mr. B. V. Subrahmanyam, the learned advocate for the appellants, that the appeal not having been referred to a Bench by a single Judge under Rule 1 of the Appellate Side Rules, cannot be heard by us. The question raised is one which is, in our opinion, of considerable importance. We may also note that several cases of this character have been disposed by Division Benches. We, therefore, desire to refer the following two questions to a Full Bench : (1) Is a Bench of two Judges competent to hear a first appeal not exceeding Rs. 7,500 in value, when it is not referred to it by a single Judge under Rule 1 of the Appellate Side Rules? (2) In any case, what is the effect of the hearing of such an appeal by a Bench without objection having been taken by the parties to such hearing ?the appeal then came on for hearing before the Full Bench (Viswanatha Sastri, bhimasankaram and Krishna Rao, JJ.) in pursuance of the above order of reference.
( 2 ) THE following questions have been referred to us :- (1) Is a Bench of two Judges competent to hear a first appeal not exceeding Rs. 7,500 in value when it is not referred to it by a single Judge under Rule 1 of the Appellate Side Rules ? (2) In any case, what is the effect of the hearing of such an appeal by a Bench without objection having been taken by the parties to such hearing ? the answer to these questions depends on the construction of Rules 1 and 2 of the Appellate Side Rules of the High Court which, so far as they are now relevant, run as follows :-"rule 1, (3) (c ).-The following matters may be heard and determined by one Judge : Provided that the Judge before whom the matter is posted for hearing may, at any time, adjourn it for hearing and determination by a Bench of two Judges :- every appealfrom an original decree when the value of such appeal does not exceed Rs. 7,500. ""rule II (2) (a ).-The following matters may be heard and determined by a Bench of two judges ; Provided that if both Judges agree that the determination involves a question of law they may order that the matter, or the question of law, be referred to a Full Bench, every appeal from the decree or order of a civil Court except those mentioned in Rule 1 :"
( 3 ) IT was sought to be argued for the respondent that the Appellate Side Rules have been framed for administrative convenience and are in the nature of domestic rules regulating the internal management of the business of the High Court and should not be construed as if they were statutory provisions conferring or taking away jurisdiction. For the appellant it was argued that the appellate Side Rules having been made by the High Court under statutory authority took effect as if they were part of the statute and should be construed in the same manner.
( 4 ) THE power to frame rules regulating its practice and procedure conferred on the High Court unde Parliamentary enactments and the Letters Patent is preserved by Article 225 of the Constitution corresponding to section 223 of the Government of India Act, 1935, which takes us back to section 106 and 108 of the Government of india Act, 1915. Section 108 of the Government of India Act, 1915, corresponds to sections 13 and 14 of the High Courts Act, 1861. It is unnecessary to reproduce these statutory provisions or clauses 36 and 37 of the Letters Patent. Suffice it to say that these provisions empower the High Court to make rules for regulating the practice of the Court and to provide by its own rules for the exercise by one or more Judges or by division Courts constituted by two or more Judges, of the original and appellate jurisdiction vested in the High Court. The Chief Justice of the High Court is the authority to determine which Judge is to sit alone and which judges are to constitute the several division Courts. The Appellate Side Rules having been made by the High Court under statutory authority referred to above, if t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.