SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 343

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Tummalapalli Anasuya – Appellant
Versus
Yenduri Parvathi – Respondent


ORDER

This C.M.S.A. is filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the judgment dated 27-4-2005 passed by the VI Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Krishna at Machilipatnam, in C.M.A.No.28 of 2004. The C.MA was filed against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.12 of 2002 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam.

2. The appellant herein filed the suit for the relief of declaration of title in respect of the suit schedule property. That very property was one of the items of the Schedule, in O.S.No.84 of 2002 (sic.1992) filed by the 15t respondent herein in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam, for the relief of partition. The appellant figured as defendant NO.1 in that suit. A preliminary decree was passed on 13-11-1998 in that suit, and the appellant is said to have filed A.S.No.770 of 1998 in this Court against the preliminary decree.

3. The appellant filed O.S.No.12 of 2002 on 12-11-2001. The 1st respondent, filed I.A.No.757 of 2003, with a prayer to try the issue of limitation as a preliminary issue. The contention was that she filed the suit for partition, way back in the year 1 992, in respect of the subject-matter in O.S.No.12 of





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top