G.ROHINI
Isra Fatima – Appellant
Versus
Bismillah Begum – Respondent
This civil revision petition is directed against the order, dated 10-9-2001 in I.A.No. 1037 of 2001 in O.S.No.451 of 1996 on the file of the Court of the VII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court. Hyderabad.
2. The Plaintiff, who is the petitioner in I.A.No. 1037 of 2001, is the revision petitioner. His case is that he filed the main suit for injunction in respect of the suit schedule property, and that the same was contested by the defendants, who are the respondents herein. During the course of the evidence of the defendants, 151 defendant examined herself as D.W.1, and through him an agreement of sale was marked as Ex. B-2. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed I.A.No.1037 of 2001 under Section 151 CPC to de-exhibit the document marked as Ex. B-2 on the ground that it was not sufficiently stamped. In the affidavit filed in support of the said application, it is stated that the document in question being an agreement of sale coupled with delivery of possession should be on a stamp paper worth the value of the consideration mentioned in the agreement, and registration of such document is mandatory. It is contended that Ex. B-2 was not sufficiently stamped and also not registered. H
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.